Monday, November 28, 2005

A Viewing of Walk the Line Prompts A New and Probably Fleeting Interest in the Man in Black -- This Post is Both Scintillating and Explosive. Really.

Hello everybody. Hope everyone had an awesome Thanskgiving. I'm back after the longest hiatus in the long, long history of the Inanities. Yeah, I know. I'm as disappointed as you are.

Anyway, over the long weekend, I saw Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire as well as Walk the Line. Harry Potter was very good, though, while watching this movie, I was more aware of the storylines and moments the filmmakers cut out of Rowling's book than I had been during the previous three. Don't know if that's a good or bad thing, or if I just remembered this book better. I read an interview with Steve Cloves today. Cloves is the screenwriter who adapted the four books so far but opted out of adapting the next book in the series, Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix. He apparently began to feel Potter-withdrawal symptoms because his life, suddenly, no longer revolved around a bunch of British kids named Harry, Ron and Hermione. So when he read the most recent book, Half-Blood Prince, he got excited about the story all over again and called Warner Bros. to ask if he could do the next one, and they said sure -- apparently they were happy to have two screenwriters working simultaneously on adapting Potter books because the studio and the whole production team are very aware that time is running out for the cast they have. They're trying to film the next two as close to back to back as possible so they don't have to recast, because if they do, Klove says -- well, take a look at the article. Blogger doesn't let me copy and paste right into the blog for whatever reason, so, you know.

Anyway, Walk the Line was very good. James Mangold did a great job -- he was smart enough to get out of the way of the story and let the actors do their thing and not clutter the film with showy camera angles and stylized editing. Joaquin Phoenix does a great job as Johnny Cash but he doesn't go exactly the way that Jamie Foxx did with Ray Charles -- Phoenix does more of a version of Cash -- sometimes he throws in certain Cashism's, like the sneer and the winks, but it never really feels like Phoenix is trying to channel Cash, and it works just fine for the movie, which is all that really matters. Though when it comes award time, the Academy may not give the Best Actor award to Joaquin -- they tend to like their depictions of real-life people to be as close to dead-on impersonations as the actors can get. Thus, the win for Jamie Foxx for Ray, the win for Ben Kingsley for Gandhi, and the nomination for Anthony Hopkins for Nixon (but surprisingly, no nomination for Jim Carrey's dead-on impersonation of Andy Kauffman -- maybe their apparent hatred of Jim Carrey trumps their love for impersonations. Hmmm) We'll see. Maybe the other dead-on impersonation will take Best Actor -- Philip Seymour Hoffman as Capote. I liked both performances in both movies.

Comparisons to Ray are inevitable but also in this case, entirely warranted. James Mangold doesn't seem particularly eager to distance his movie from that one, in either style or tone, and why should he? Ray Charles and Johnny Cash, like a lot of super-famous musicians, had similar trajectories. Walk the Line is very much like a white version of Ray. It had everything Ray had: dirt-poor rural upbringings, the death of a family member that scars them for the rest of their lives, womanizing, and drug abuse, but one thing Walk the Line does not have, is the long shadow of racism that pervaded almost every frame of Ray. That Walk doesn't have that pervasive tension isn't necessarily a detractor, I think. Is Walk the Line better than Ray? It's tighter than Ray structurally, but Walk doesn't feel as rich or as lively as Ray, and that may be in part because of the personalities involved -- Ray Charles was an exuberant on-stage personality, whereas Johnny Cash seemed to be more of a shy, reserved performer, but that's just from my own 28-year old perspective -- he was definitely not a musician of my generation. I wasn't really aware of Johnny Cash as anything more than a peripheral country musician who'd been famous since the time of the dinosaurs until he started to get some acclaim in the late nineties from "hip" modern music critics (like the guys at Rolling Stone) for his body of work. I guess everyone was starting to realize that Johnny Cash was getting old and so some reevaluation was in order -- to understand his place in music history and the Rock and Roll firmament. According to the mainstream rock critics, Johnny Cash was either becoming a crossover artist in his later years, or he already was and they were finally recognizing that fact, I don't remember. And then, a few years ago, there was the "Hurt" video, where Johnny Cash covered the song originally written and performed by Trent Reznor of Nine Inch Nails. I don't know if Marc Romanek will make a better film in his life, but I kind of doubt it. Filmed after Cash had become gravely ill and before his wife, June Carter Cash, died, it's shocking and painfully honest. I think it probably helped get Walk the Line made.
The movie's kind of imbedded itself in my head since I saw it and I wanted to talk about it some. I downloaded some Cash songs in the past couple of days: "Walk the Line", "Folsom Prison Blues", "Ring of Fire". They're definitely in that country tradition of songs primarily interested in telling stories. His songs, at least those few songs I listed, aren't really to my taste, but they're good, I think -- I guess my interest in Johnny Cash isn't really fueled by a great love for his music, but rather because I admire him for appearing in Romanek's video in his condition (I believe he was then recovering from a debilitating stroke -- he looks markedly worse in the video than he does in the included photo of the elder Cash), and for recording "Hurt". Though the lyrics weren't his, he infused Reznor's rock-dirge with a gravitas Reznor never got close to. It's rare to find that musician who has something musically worthwhile to say all the way to the bitter end of their careers, but Cash appears to be one of them. I wished they'd touched on the video in some way in Walk the Line, but I'm guessing Mangold didn't want to let Romanek's work infringe on his own, no matter how apt it might have been. Anyway. If you haven't already, I would reccomend both Harry Potter and Walk the Line. More inanities tomorrow.


JudgeHolden said...

I can already tell this post is going to get no comments. I can just feel it. No one will prove me wrong.

Anonymous said...


blankfist said...

I think I may see this one. I'm a decent fan of Cash, I think. I did see Harry Potter, and I liked it a lot. I cannot tell if I like it more than the Prisoner of Ass-Kickin' or not. Hard to say. I feel as if most of the people who've read the books are disappointed in this one. I guess I've learned a lesson here, and that lesson is to never read the books, because it was a fantastic and full thrill ride for me.

It would seem if the book was quite large like Goblet was, then they'd have to leave out a large portion of the story, and what's worse, combine a larger portion of it. That's why it makes little sense to me to read the book. Then again, that's why I studied film not literature.

Oh well. People sure do get nasty on your blog Crane. Censor these people, will you, Mister FCCrane! I mean, just look at anonymous, sitting there with that apostrophe hanging with all its potential of being a curse word... yeah, I'm talking to you mister 'vulgar syntax apostraphe' man. That makes no sense.

Anonymous said...

Mr. FistMe is right. I apologize. This blog is not the place for 'ing.

Harry Potter was disappointing mostly because the book wasn't good either, next movie please.

Crane Rulz

Anonymous said...

In Honor of not downloading Man in Black off the internet, I give you much love

Fried Pepperoni said...

I finally saw Walk the Line last night, which means I can finally review your review (seeing HP in Imax this afternoon, too). A spot on review in many ways of a really solid film, but I think you left one major component out that lifts the film above Ray (in my opinion) and many, many other biopics: I'm talking Reese Witherspoon, my friend. She's incredible in this film! I was blown away! I couldn't pick a picture of June Carter Cash out of high school yearbook if you asked me to, but Reese's performance felt so authentic to me in the ways I imagine the real June must've been like. And as a fellow Southerner, don't you think she just had it? The whole Southern shebang? Perfect casting. And unlike Ray, Walk the Line is a real love story. Because of this, the ending felt so satisfying to me, whereas with Ray I was just sort of ready for it to end. There was too much music in Ray, and you're right - structurally Mangold did a much better job. I think extending the film into the Cash's old age would've been a mistake if for no other reason than we would've sat there thinking, "that doesn't look like old Johnny Cash," because we all know what old Johnny Cash looked like.

Anyway, good stuff. I thought Joaquin was great, but personally I'm really kind of hoping the Academy gets away from handing out Oscars to impersonations. Plus, giving Joaquin an Oscar means next year we'll have to hear about whatever actor is portraying whatever next dead musician. Not unlike how we expect the prettiest actress in the ugliest role to bring home the best actress statue these days.

As for the Andy Kaufman show, I think that was more a result of the movie not being all that great. If ever there was a film that felt like the abridged version of someone's life, it was Man on the Moon. Very glad Ray and Walk the Line didn't follow that path. Or line.

Reese for President 2008!! Legally Blonde 3!! Wooo!

Fried Pepperoni said...

P.S. The Cash version of Bob Marley's "Redemption Song" is also very good, and you gotta get "Cocaine Blues" which is the song the film showed him singing in Folsom.