data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0d3f3/0d3f33c486297109ca7356747399d62d1899e692" alt=""
The Smartest Guys in the Room wasn't at all bad -- I feel like I get the whole Enron thing much better now after having watched it, but it was not a technically brilliant documentary. The emotional and human costs of the Enron debacle were never really explored, just the hows and whys of the collapse. Interesting, but a little cold. However, it's supposedly a lock for an Oscar nomination for Best Feature-Length Documentary and a frontrunner for the award itself, while Grizzly Man, which I'm still dying to see and about which I've heard only esctatically good reviews, will not even be nominated. (I'm not sure if that's because it's ineligible, or if because the Academy wasn't into it, I don't know. Ebert and Roeper are my source on that one.)
The New World, Terrence Malick's new movie, is brilliant and everyone should go and see it. How's that for an endorsement? And even with slightly creepy Colin Farrell in it (who may prove to be this generation's Mickey Rourke), it's still damn good. Unlike other directors, who, in their films are concerned primarily with the vagaries of plot and making sure the audience is artificially primed for one twist or another, Malick is confident enough in both his material and his viewer that he doesn't feel the need to handhold the viewer. If his transition from one scene to another is a low-angle shot of an old pine tree reaching high into the air, he's not concerned whether it makes absolute sense to everyone at that moment. It's almost as though whatever thought or emotion a viewer has upon viewing that shot of the tree is, for Malick, the correct one. This is all just my undereducated film-student-y perception of it, but it feels that way. My friend David Speck likened New World to Baraka, and I think that's right. Where Baraka is essentially all cinematic poetry, New World is a mix of poetry and prose -- all used in service of telling a (if not the) story of Pocahontas, from naive wood nymph to the more-or-less westernized woman who had an audience with the King and Queen of England (Incidentally, they never once say her name in the movie -- kind of interesting). Anyway, good stuff. It's slowly-paced and doesn't feature a lot of dialogue, so it may not be for everyone, but I loved it.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3e43a/3e43ace5f8029160e4476b6b6fb25d6a65fe0c08" alt=""
Also, NBC officially cancelled The West Wing which sucks. I was never that into the show until last season when the campaign to find a successor to Martin Sheen's character got into full swing. The show had shaken off the lethargy left after Sorkin's departure and was getting really good again. And now it's gone. Darn it, I wanted to see another character in the Oval Office. Now all we got is St. Geena Davis on that Commander-in-Chief show. Blecch. All right, I've bored everyone enough for one day. More tomorrow.
PS. Good Molly Ivins column here. She's not supporting Hillary Clinton and says why. Ok, I'm done for real.
8 comments:
Any movie you say is good must be terrible. Waterworld hat. Admit defeat.
Admit it, and I will be done.
The New World was an amazing movie.
I saw it before it had 17 minutes cut out.
-Speck
Waterworld hat. Waterworld hat. Full price.
Holy shit Heath...
knock it off already, this is more annoying the "food for thought"
Speck
Go punch Nathan, Speck. Waterworld hat.
Go punch Nathan, Speck. Waterworld hat.
There... I said it twice... I win again.
And if only I was telling Spock to punch you. Wow. But, alas, I wrote Speck. Ho-hum.
Post a Comment